[Ruth Davis]

Update item status from Check In / Item Status window

[Ruth Davis]

Option(s) to email circulation receipts

[Ruth Davis]

There is current discussion on this and some testing to be done.

[Ruth Davis]

https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1861013

[Ruth Davis]

https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1818144

[Ruth Davis]

While there is the ability for libraries to update their own hours and address (with the appropriate permissions), there is no way to account for libraries that have multiple discrete blocks of open time on a given day. This is a desirable feature documented here. https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1396764

[Ruth Davis]

This does seem like a potentially easy fix addition. And possibly something that the New Developers Workshop could take a look at even.

[Ruth Davis]

Ben,

This came up because OCLC is changing some things related to fixed fields which means all of our MARC templates will need to be updated. This is something that I could/should conceivably be able to do very easily as a global administrator. But, because it requires editing through direct server access and also requires an OpenSRF restart, I can’t. I am positive that my organization is not the only one this impacts.

[Ruth Davis]

There IS the ability for this permission to be granted to local administrators. In digging through this ticket, we also uncovered a poorly constructed permission in EG-IN, so a big thanks to Shannon. I am in the process of sussing out what is already there and what needs to be added to address this feature request.

[Ruth Davis]

Yes. It seems like the best we can do right now is extrapolate some approximation of granularity in terms of billing types, etc. From an actual bookkeeping standpoint, fixes/development to billing need to happen.

[Ruth Davis]

We absolutely would have to have an address checker that could compare to provided districts and assign the patron automatically to the correct district or it would be illegal to implement here, not to mention risky if your econtent contracts have any residency basis.

[Ruth Davis]

We would need any development to be able to leverage multiple consortia/accounts for this to be useful in Indiana. The API as I’ve seen it so far would not support local contracts or multiple consortia.

[Ruth Davis]

More reporting headaches rolling in today that would be fixed with this development.

[Ruth Davis]

Adding https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1745623 for the conversation in the comments.

• This reply was modified 4 years, 7 months ago by Ruth Davis.

[Ruth Davis]

Several fixes to this have been posted in LP.

[Author]

Posts